Find

Find

Search for over 200,000 study notes and past assignments!

Swap

Swap

Download study resources by swapping your own or buying Exchange Credits.

Study

Study

Study from your library anywhere, anytime.

31 Pages Topic Notes Year: Pre-2021

McHale v Watson (HCA (a boy hit a girl by bolt)) Facts: Barry Watson, aged 12, threw a piece of scrap metal of bolt, which he had sharpened at one end at a hardwood post expecting it to stick in the post. The dart either missed he post or hit it and glanced off and hit nine-year-old Susan McHale, who was standing near the post. Susan was blinded in one eye. Judgment: McTiernan ACJ: Ø Windeyer J [the trial judge] said in his reasons for judgment: “It has been strongly urged for the plaintiff that, in considering whether Barry was negligent, I must judge what he did by the standard expected of a reasonable man, and that that standard is not graduated according to age” Ø In Glasgow Corporation v Muir Lord Macmillan said: “The standard of foresight of the reasonable man is, in one sense, an impersonal test.” Ø His Honour considered that the defendant, being a boy of twelve years, did not have enough maturity of mind to foresee that the dart might glance off the post in the direction of Susan if he did not make it hit the post squarely, and that there was a possibility that he might not succeed in doing so. Ø General principle that a young boy who cannot be classified as a grown-up person cannot be guilty of negligence in any circumstances. o Kitto J:But it does not follow that he cannot rely in his defense upon a limitation upon the capacity for foresight or prudence, not as being personal to himself, but as being characteristic of humanity at his stage of development and in that sense normal.


This document is 5 Exchange Credits

More about this document:

This document has been hand checked

Every document on Thinkswap has been carefully hand checked to make sure it's correctly described and categorised. No more browsing through piles of irrelevant study resources.

These are Topic Notes

Topic Notes typically cover a topic (or several topics) in detail. They are not expected to cover all the topics in the course and are often less than 20 pages in length.

What are Exchange Credits?

Exchange Credits represent the worth of each document on Thinkswap. In exchange for uploading documents you will receive Exchange Credits. These credits can then be used to download other documents for free.

Satisfaction Guarantee

We want you to be satisfied with your learning, that’s why all documents on Thinkswap are covered by our Satisfaction Guarantee. If a document is not of an acceptable quality or the document was incorrectly described or categorised, we will provide a full refund of Exchange Credits so that you can get another document. For more information please read Thinkswap's Satisfaction Guarantee.

Academic Integrity
Studying with Academic Integrity

Studying from past student work is an amazing way to learn and research, however you must always act with academic integrity.

This document is the prior work of another student. Thinkswap has partnered with Turnitin to ensure students cannot copy directly from our resources. Understand how to responsibly use this work by visiting ‘Using Thinkswap resources correctly’.

Claim a Bounty

Torts 2017 Template for the Exam - Includes all Related Cases  - Page 1
Page 1 /31
Page 1 /31
Torts 2017 Template for the Exam - Includes all Related Cases  - Page 15
Page 15 /31
Page 15 /31
Torts 2017 Template for the Exam - Includes all Related Cases  - Page 23
Page 23 /31
Page 23 /31

Similar documents to "Torts 2017 Template for the Exam - Includes all Related Cases " avaliable on Thinkswap

Documents similar to "Torts 2017 Template for the Exam - Includes all Related Cases " are suggested based on similar topic fingerprints from a variety of other Thinkswap Subjects

Browse UNSW Subjects

University

High School